False Information Irrelevant for the Purpose of Determining Whether a Protection Visa Should be Refused Under S91WA of the Act
BMK18 v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor
[Time to read: 2 mins]
Read MoreAAT Case: Consideration of “Non-Political Crime”
Concerns surrounding whether Applicant committed a serious non-political crime in Malaysia before entering Australia.
[Time to read: 3 mins]
Read MoreVisitor Visa Proving More Difficult in Satisfying the Genuine Temporary Entrant (‘GTE’) Criteria
Ammar v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 376 (20 February 2019)
[Time to read: 4 mins]
Read MoreAAT Case: Setting Aside of a Decision to Refuse a Bridging Visa Application Based on Character Test
Kayo Rerekura and Minister for Home Affairs (Migration) [2019] AATA 153
[Time to read: 3 mins]
Read MoreCitizenship Application: Have You Ever Been an Unlawful Non-Citizen in Australia?
Mabagos and Minister for Home Affairs (Citizenship) [2019] AATA 216 (22 February 2019)
[Time to read: 2 mins]
Read MoreTattoo Artist Considered to Have Been Qualified for a Distinguished Talent Visa
[2018] AATA 4742 (6 December 2018)
[Time to read: 4mins]
Read MoreMaterial Issue Must Be “Fundamental”, “Important” or “Overwhelming” Such That a Failure to Consider Them by the Tribunal Would Constitute a Jurisdictional Error!
Karki v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 319 (18 February 2019)
[Time to read: 4 mins]
Read MoreCitizenship Application: Australia Has Zero Tolerance Against Fraudulent Identity
Fraud would not be whitewashed by subsequent good behaviour and passage of time, and integrity is crucial for applying for citizenship.
[Time to read: 3 mins]
Read MoreCandidates Who are Over 55 Years Old are Still Eligible to be Granted Distinguished Talent Visa (Subclass 858)
The Distinguished Talent Visa (Subclass 858) are permanent visas for persons who have a world widely acknowledged record of distinguished and outstanding achievement in a profession, a sport, the arts or academia and research.
[Time to read: 2 mins]
Read MoreAAT Case: Bogus Documents Not a Show-Stopper for Citizenship Application
Alsaad and Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (Citizenship)[1] concerns a refusal of an Australian citizenship application on the basis that the applicant provided a bogus document, and therefore is not of a ‘good character’.
[Time to read: 2 mins]
Read MoreNew Information Provided Must Be Considered by Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA)
FKO17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 98 (12 February 2019)
[Time to read: 3 mins]
Read MoreAustralian Citizenship Application: Applicants Must Meet the 4-Year Stay Requirement
Boonruang and Minister for Home Affairs (Citizenship) [2019] AATA 147 (15 February 2019)
[Time to read: 2 mins]
Read MoreHow to Identify Tribunal’s Error in Their Decision-Making Process for Partner Visa Applications
Fobizi v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2017] FCCA 1738 (3 August 2017)
[Time to read: 2 mins]
Read MorePossible Ground for Revoking Mandatory Visa Cancellation Involving Imprisonment of 12 Months
Da Silva and Minister for Home Affairs (Migration) [2019] AATA 68 (25 January 2019)
[Time to read: 3 mins]
Read MoreRevisiting a Landmark Case: Cohabitation is Not a Necessary Requirement in a De Facto Relationship to Apply for the Partner Visa
SZOXP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 69 (11 June 2015)
[Time to read : 3 mins]
Read More