Suspension, Not Cancellation: Inside Australia’s Section 84B Power to Freeze 61,000 Visas With One Signature

The Migration Amendment (2026 Measures No. 1) Act 2026 gives the Minister for Home Affairs the power to suspend every temporary visa held by an entire nationality—overnight, without notice, and without review. Here is what it means, who it targets, and what you can do right now to protect yourself.

What Just Happened for Offshore Temporary Visas and Their Entry Rights?

On 12 March 2026, the Australian Parliament passed the Migration Amendment (2026 Measures No. 1) Act 2026. The Act received Royal Assent on 13 March 2026. Schedule 1—containing the arrival control determination powers—commenced on 14 March 2026. It inserts a new Subdivision AGA into Division 3 of Part 2 the Migration Act 1958, creating a mechanism called an “arrival control determination.”

In plain terms: the Minister for Home Affairs now has the legal power to suspend every temporary visa held by a specified class of offshore non-citizens—an entire nationality, an entire visa subclass, or both—with one legislative instrument. No individual notice. No merits review. No disallowance by the Senate. No natural justice (s57). The only court that can hear a challenge is the High Court of Australia, subject to constitutional limitations on the ouster of judicial review.

As of 20 March 2026, no arrival control determination has been made. No visas have been suspended. But the law is in force, the political signals are unmistakable, and the first target has been identified in Parliament: Iranian temporary visa holders.

If you hold a temporary visa and you are outside Australia—or if you are planning to travel outside Australia on a temporary visa—this article explains exactly what this law means for you, how it works, who is exempt, and what you should be doing right now.

Are You at Risk?

If you hold a temporary visa and are concerned about whether this law could affect you or your family, do not wait for a determination to be made. Contact Agape Henry Crux now via +61 2 8310 5230 for an urgent assessment of your situation and a strategy to protect your position.

What Triggered This Law: The 2026 Iran Conflict

Although the Bill is drafted as a framework of general application—it does not name any country—the parliamentary debate leaves no ambiguity about its immediate trigger.

On 28 February 2026, the United States and Israel launched military strikes against Iran. Iran retaliated with missile and drone attacks across the region, including the UAE, where Australia maintains a long-standing military presence at Al Minhad Air Base. On 3 March 2026, Iranian loitering munitions struck the Al Minhad base. On 10 March, the Albanese Government deployed 85 ADF personnel, a Boeing E-7A Wedgetail early warning aircraft, and stocks of air-to-air missiles to the Gulf. On 18 March, an Iranian strike caused damage to Australian facilities at Al Minhad for the second time.

On the same day the Government announced the ADF deployment—10 March 2026—Minister for Home Affairs Tony Burke introduced the Bill into the House of Representatives. On that same day, he also flew to Brisbane and initially granted protection visas to five players from the Iranian women’s national football team, with further offers extended to additional members of the delegation the following day.

The Bill was passed through both Houses in two days. The crossbench received it at 11 am on Tuesday and were forced to vote on Thursday. A motion to refer the Bill to a Senate committee was defeated by Labor and the Coalition.

Who Is the First Target? The Numbers From Parliament

During a Senate committee hearing on approximately 10–11 March 2026, Department of Home Affairs officials confirmed the following figures for temporary visa holders from the Middle East who are currently offshore and could be caught by the first determination:

Iran: 7,200
United Arab Emirates: 6,435
Lebanon: 1,150
Qatar: 1,096
Syria: 207
Palestine: 157
Total across the region: approximately 61,000

Senator Duniam (Coalition) stated on the Hansard record that these figures came directly from departmental officials at the committee hearing. Senator Shoebridge (Greens) stated that “the Government has made clear that it plans to immediately use this law against 7,200 current visa holders from Iran.”

Minister Burke himself stated at a press conference on or about 11 March 2026: “If you sought a visa at a time that your country was not a war zone, and then it becomes a war zone, there are visas out there that in the current context, we would not have issued.”

How the Arrival Control Determination Works

The Power

Under new section 84B(1), the Minister may, by legislative instrument, make an arrival control determination specifying that section 84E applies to one or more specified classes of non-citizens. The determination is a personal power of the Minister—it cannot be delegated (s 84B(7)).

The Pre-Conditions

Before making a determination, the Minister must satisfy all of the following requirements cumulatively:

Be reasonably satisfied that an event or circumstance has occurred or is occurring outside Australia (s 84B(2)(a)).
Be reasonably satisfied that one or both of the following apply:
1. (a) having regard to the event or circumstance, affected non-citizens may, if they enter Australia on a temporary visa, remain in Australia after the visa ceases to be in effect; or
2. (b) if the event or circumstance had occurred or been occurring at the time the non-citizens were to make an application for a temporary visa, the visa may not have been granted (s 84B(2)(b)).
Be satisfied it is in the national interest, having regard to the object of the Subdivision (s 84B(2)(c)).
Obtain written agreement from the Prime Minister and the Minister administering the Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Act 1967 (in practice, the Minister for Foreign Affairs) (s 84B(3)).

[Note: requirements 1, 2, and 3 above are cumulative—all must be satisfied. Within requirement 2, the two sub-limbs are alternatives—only one need be met.]

The Effect

Once the determination commences, every temporary visa held by a non-citizen in the specified class who is outside Australia ceases to be in effect (s 84E(1)). The visa is not cancelled. The visa period keeps running. But the visa cannot be used for travel. Airlines will deny boarding. Immigration will refuse clearance.

Duration

A determination can be in force for a maximum of six months (s 84B(6)). It cannot be varied or extended (s 84B(9)). But it can be revoked early (s 84B(4)), and—critically—a new determination can be made for the same class and the same event once the first one expires, provided the pre-conditions are met again (s 84B(10)). There is no limit on the number of times this can be repeated.

Why Suspension, Not Cancellation?

This is the architectural question at the heart of the scheme, and the answer is uncomfortable. If the Government cancelled individual visas, each cancellation would be an administrative decision attracting individual notification, reasons, and merits review rights. That is expensive, slow, and generates litigation. The visa ceasing to be in effect by force of a legislative instrument avoids all of that. There is no individual decision, no individual notification, no merits review, and no Administrative Review Tribunal jurisdiction. The cessation operates automatically, by force of law, on an entire class at once.

In short: the suspension-not-cancellation design is not a kindness. It is specifically engineered to avoid the procedural rights that cancellation would trigger.

Who Is Exempt?

Section 84C sets out mandatory exemptions. The determination does not apply to:

Holders of a protection visa that is a temporary visa (TPVs, SHEVs) (s 84C(1)(a)).
Holders of temporary safe haven visas (s 84C(1)(b)).
Holders of Temporary (Humanitarian Concern) (Class UO) visas (s 84C(1)(c)).
Holders of bridging visas granted on the basis of an application for one of the above (s 84C(1)(d)).
Non-citizens who are in Australia when the determination commences (s 84C(3)).
The spouse, de facto partner, or dependent child of an Australian citizen, permanent visa holder, or person usually resident in Australia (s 84C(4)(a)).
A parent of a child under 18 who is in Australia (s 84C(4)(b)).
A non-citizen who holds a permitted travel certificate (s 84C(4)(c)).

Permanent visa holders are inherently unaffected—section 84E(1) only operates on temporary visas. If you hold a permanent visa, this scheme does not touch you.

Who Is NOT Exempt (The Gaps)?

The following people are not protected by the exemptions, even if they have deep connections to Australia:

Grandparents of Australian citizens or permanent residents.
Siblings of Australian citizens or permanent residents.
Adult children of Australian citizens or permanent residents.
Parents of adult children (over 18) in Australia.
De facto partners who cannot prove the relationship.
Anyone in transit to Australia when the determination is made.

Amendments to expand these exemptions to include parents, grandparents, siblings, and persons in transit were moved by crossbench MPs and Senators across multiple amendment sheets—including the Pocock–Tyrrell omnibus (14 amendments), the Steggall amendments (10 amendments), the Chaney amendments (7 amendments), and further sheets from the Greens, Senator Thorpe, and Senator Tyrrell. Every single amendment was defeated.

The Permanent Visa Shield: Why You Need to Act Now

A permanent visa is completely outside the reach of this law. Section 84E(1) operates only on temporary visas. If you hold a subclass 189, 190, 191, 801, 100, or any other permanent visa, you are unaffected. Your right to travel to and from Australia is untouched.

This makes the pathway from temporary to permanent status more urgent than it has ever been. If you are currently on a temporary visa—a student visa, a graduate visa, a skilled worker visa, a partner visa in the temporary stream—now is the time to accelerate your permanent visa application.

Consider this timeline: if a determination is made in the coming weeks and you are outside Australia on a temporary visa, your visa ceases to be in effect. You cannot return. Your visa period keeps running. If your visa expires during the period the determination is in force, you lose it entirely—and there is no automatic extension. But if you had already lodged a permanent visa application and been granted a bridging visa, or if you had already been granted a permanent visa, you would be completely unaffected.

The window between now and the first determination is the window in which to act.

Protect Yourself With a Permanent Visa Strategy

If you are on a temporary visa and eligible for a permanent pathway—whether through skilled migration, employer sponsorship, partner visa, or any other stream—contact Agape Henry Crux immediately by calling +61 2 8310 5230. We can assess your eligibility, prepare your application, and lodge it before a determination is made. Every day counts.

The Permitted Travel Certificate: The Only Individual Exemption

If you are caught by a determination, the only route to individual relief is a permitted travel certificate under section 84D. Here is what you need to know:

The Minister (or a delegate—this power is delegable under s 496(1)) may issue a certificate providing that the determination does not apply to you. You or an authorised representative can make a written request. But:

The Minister has no duty even to consider your request. The power is expressly non-compellable (s 84D(8)).
Natural justice (S57) does not apply (s 84D(7)).
There is no timeframe for a decision.
There is no right of review if the request is refused or ignored.

The criteria are entirely at the Minister’s discretion: the Minister must be “satisfied in all the circumstances that it is appropriate” for the determination not to apply. The Explanatory Memorandum gives examples—genuine temporary travel, compelling or compassionate cases, foreign policy interest—but these are policy indications, not statutory criteria.

If you need to apply for a permitted travel certificate, professional assistance is essential. The request must be compelling, well-evidenced, and framed to address the Minister’s discretionary criteria. This is not a form you fill in and submit—it is a submission that must persuade.

Can It Be Challenged? Judicial Review

The Bill amends section 474(7)(a) of the Migration Act to include section 84B as a privative clause decision. The effect, stated plainly in the Explanatory Memorandum at paragraph 80, is that only the High Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear a challenge to an arrival control determination. Federal Court jurisdiction is ousted, subject to the constitutional limitations on privative clauses established in Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476.

The determination itself is characterised as a legislative power, not an administrative one. Natural justice is excluded (s 84B(8)). Disallowance is excluded (s 84B(13)). The only parliamentary accountability is a tabling requirement within two sitting days (s 84F)—and failure to comply with that requirement does not affect the validity of the determination (s 84F(3)).

A constitutional challenge to the first determination is widely anticipated once it is made. The likely grounds would include whether the power is supported by the aliens power (s 51(xix)) or the immigration power (s 51(xxvii)) of the Constitution, and whether a privative clause can validly oust review of a power with such significant individual effects. But as of today, no challenge has been filed—because no determination has been made.

The Temporal Trap: The Visa Period Problem

This is the sleeper issue that most commentary has missed.

When a determination expires or is revoked, the visa comes back into effect under section 84E(2)—but only “during the visa period for the visa.” The visa period is not extended. This is confirmed by paragraph 64 of the Explanatory Memorandum, which states that the determination “does not have any effect on the existing visa period (expiry date) of the visa.”

This means: if you hold a 12-month visa with 4 months remaining when the determination commences, and the determination runs for 6 months, your visa period expires during the period your visa has ceased to be in effect. The visa never comes back into effect. You have lost your visa entirely—not through cancellation, not through refusal, but through the effluxion of time during a period you had no power to prevent.

Amendments requiring automatic visa extension for the period of suspension were proposed by Steggall (amendment (9)), Pocock and Tyrrell (amendment (13)), and Chaney (amendments (6) and (7)). All were defeated.

If you have a temporary visa with limited remaining validity, you are at particularly acute risk. Contact Agape Henry Crux immediately so we can assess your options before a determination is made.

What Was Debated: The Political Landscape

Who supported the Bill: Labor (Government) and the Coalition (Opposition). The Bill passed with bipartisan support.
Who opposed: The Australian Greens (including Senators Shoebridge, Waters, Faruqi, and Hodgins-May), Senator David Pocock (Independent, ACT), Senator Thorpe (Independent, VIC), and Senator Tyrrell (Independent).

The Greens characterised the law as a “Trump-style Muslim ban” and a “race to the bottom with One Nation.” Senator Thorpe called it “Labor’s new White Australia policy.” Senator Pocock delivered the most legally measured critique, focusing on the breadth of the powers, the loose definitions, the absence of a sunset clause, and the inconsistency between Australia’s generous response to Ukrainian displacement and its punitive response to Middle Eastern displacement.

Crossbench amendments were moved across multiple amendment sheets, addressing: tightening the threshold from “may” to “would”; defining “event or circumstance” narrowly; restoring natural justice; restoring disallowance; expanding family exemptions to include grandparents and siblings; protecting persons in transit; requiring visa extension; requiring compensation for affected non-citizens; and enabling Resolution of Status visa applications by transitory persons. Every single amendment was defeated.

Don’t Wait Until It’s Too Late

The law is in force. No determination has been made yet—but every political signal points to one being imminent. Whether you need to fast-track a permanent visa application, prepare a permitted travel certificate request, or simply understand how this affects your family, our team is here to help. The time to act is now, not after your visa has been suspended.

☎ +61 2 8310 5230 | BOOK YOUR CONSULTATION TODAY

What You Should Do Right Now

If You Are on a Temporary Visa and Currently Outside Australia
Return to Australia as soon as possible. Under section 84C(3), if you are in the migration zone when the determination commences, your visa is unaffected. This is the single most important protective step you can take.
If You Are on a Temporary Visa and Currently in Australia
Think very carefully before travelling overseas. If a determination is made while you are outside Australia, your visa ceases to be in effect and you cannot return. If you must travel, seek professional advice before departure.
If You Are Eligible for a Permanent Visa
Lodge your application now. A permanent visa is completely outside the reach of this law. Even a pending permanent visa application with a bridging visa may provide some protection, depending on the circumstances. The window between now and the first determination is the critical period.
If You Have Family Members on Temporary Visas Overseas
Check whether they fall within the section 84C(4) family exemptions. If they are your spouse, de facto partner, or dependent child, they are exempt. If they are your parent, sibling, grandparent, or adult child, they are not exempt. Seek urgent advice on permitted travel certificate applications and permanent visa pathways.
If You Are an Employer Sponsoring Temporary Visa Holders
Identify which of your sponsored employees are currently offshore or planning overseas travel. Consider the operational impact of a determination on your workforce. Seek advice on contingency planning and permitted travel certificate protocols.

Key Dates and Timeline

28 February 2026: US-Israeli military strikes on Iran commence.
3 March 2026: Iranian loitering munitions strike Al Minhad Air Base (UAE), where Australian personnel are stationed.
10 March 2026: Bill introduced to House of Representatives. ADF deployment announced. Minister Burke initially grants protection visas to five Iranian women’s football players.
11 March 2026: Bill transmitted to the Senate. Second reading speech incorporated into Hansard. Further protection visa offers made to additional delegation members.
12 March 2026: Senate debate. All amendments defeated. Bill passed both Houses.
13 March 2026: Royal Assent.
14 March 2026: Schedule 1 commences. Arrival control determination power becomes available.
18 March 2026: Second Iranian strike on Al Minhad Air Base.
20 March 2026 (today): No determination has been made. The power is ready to be exercised.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is an arrival control determination?
An arrival control determination is a legislative instrument made by the Minister for Home Affairs under new section 84B of the Migration Act 1958. It specifies that temporary visas held by a defined class of offshore non-citizens cease to be in effect. It is not a visa cancellation—it is a temporary suspension of the visa’s operation, which means the visa cannot be used for travel to Australia while the determination is in force.
Does the arrival control determination affect permanent visas?
No. Section 84E(1) operates only on temporary visas. If you hold any permanent visa—including subclass 189, 190, 191, 801, 100, or any other permanent visa—you are completely unaffected. Your right to travel to and from Australia is untouched.
Who is exempt from an arrival control determination?
The following people are exempt under section 84C: holders of temporary protection visas (TPVs, SHEVs); holders of temporary safe haven visas; holders of Temporary (Humanitarian Concern) (Class UO) visas; holders of associated bridging visas; anyone who is in Australia when the determination commences; the spouse, de facto partner, or dependent child of an Australian citizen or permanent resident; and a parent of a child under 18 in Australia. Holders of a permitted travel certificate are also exempt.
How do I apply for a permitted travel certificate?
You or an authorised representative (such as an immigration lawyer) may make a written request to the Minister under section 84D(2). There is no prescribed form. The request must persuade the Minister that it is appropriate in all the circumstances for the determination not to apply to you. There is no obligation on the Minister to consider the request, no right of review, and no timeframe. Professional assistance is strongly recommended—contact Agape Henry Crux for help preparing your submission.
Can I challenge an arrival control determination in court?
The determination is a privative clause decision under section 474 of the Migration Act. Only the High Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear a challenge. Federal Court jurisdiction is ousted. A constitutional challenge to the first determination is widely anticipated, but no challenge has been filed as of 20 March 2026 because no determination has yet been made.
What happens if my visa expires during the suspension period?
This is one of the most critical issues. When the determination expires or is revoked, your visa comes back into effect—but only if your visa period has not already expired. The visa period is not extended during the suspension. If your visa expires while the determination is in force, your visa never comes back into effect. You will have lost your visa through the effluxion of time. Amendments to require automatic extension were proposed and defeated in Parliament.
Has an arrival control determination been made yet?
No. As of 20 March 2026, no determination has been made. The power is available to the Minister and can be exercised at any time, with the written agreement of the Prime Minister and the Minister for Foreign Affairs.

Read our clients’ testimonials on Agape Henry Crux and Accredited Specialist in Immigration Law, Jason Ling.

How Can Agape Henry Crux Help

If you’re planning to apply or have any questions about the subclass 190 or 491 visa application processfor Tasmania, reach out to speak with one of our immigration lawyers for professional advice and guidance. At Agape Henry Crux, our team of immigration lawyers work together with our Accredited Specialists in Immigration Law, who specialise in handling highly complex matters. You can book a consultation with one of our lawyers to seek professional advice by calling 02-8310 5230 or emailing us at info@ahclawyers.com.

We speak fluent English and Mandarin. If this isn’t your language, we can also help you arrange an interpreter.

Our founder and principal lawyer, Jason Ling, has been recognised in the 2026 edition of The Best Lawyers in Australia™. Agape Henry Crux is named as Best Immigration Law Firm 2025 - Sydney by APAC Insider Awards.

This article/presentation (“publication”) does not deal extensively with important topics or changes in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you find this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances, please contact our office.

Client Testimonials

….we call it Support Network

Navigating the immigration law process may be difficult, and our former clients have agreed to share their experiences through telephone chats, emails, and in-person meetings.

These are their stories…

Our Client's Latest Visa Grants